[David Strom's Web Informant] Joey Skaggs and the art of the media hoax

David Strom david at strom.com
Sun Nov 6 19:10:22 EST 2016

​Web Informant, November 6, 2016: Joey Skaggs and the art of the media hoax​

I have had the pleasure of knowing Joey Skaggs for several decades, and
observing his media hoaxing antics first-hand during the development and
deployment of his many pranks. Skaggs is a professional hoaxer, meaning
that he deliberately crafts elaborate stunts to fool reporters, get himself
covered on TV and in newspapers, only to reveal afterwards that the
reporters have been had. He sometimes spends years constructing these set
pieces, fine-tuning them and involving a cast of supporting characters to
bring his hoax to life.

His latest stunt is a documentary movie about filming another documentary
movie that is being shown at various film festivals around the world. I
caught up with him this past weekend here in St. Louis, when our local film
festival screened the movie called The Art of the Prank
<http://www.artoftheprank-themovie.com/>. Ostensibly, this is a movie about
Skaggs and one of his pranks. More about the movie in a moment.

I have covered Skaggs' exploits a few times. In 1994, he created a story
about a fake bust of a sex-based virtual reality venture called
Sexonix. I wrote
a piece for Wired <https://www.wired.com/1994/02/electric-word-11/> (scroll
to nearly the bottom of the page) where he was able to whip up passions. In
the winter of 1998, I wrote about one of his hoaxes, which was about some
issues with a rogue project from an environmental organization based in
Queensland, Australia. The project created and spread a genetically altered
virus. When humans come into contact with the virus, they begin to crave
junk food. To add credibility to the story, the virus was found to have
infected Hong Kong chickens, among other animals. Skaggs created a phony
website here <http://stopbiopeep.com>, which contains documentation and
copies of emails and photos. Now remember, this was 1998: back then
newspapers were still thriving, and the Web was just getting going as a
source for journalists.

As part of this hoax, Skaggs also staged a fake demonstration outside the
United Nations headquarters campus in New York City. The AP and the NY
Post, along with European and Australian newspapers, duly covered the
protest, and thus laid the groundwork for the hoax.

Since then he has done dozens of other hoaxes. He set up a computerized
jurisprudence system called the Solomon Project that found OJ guilty, a
bordello for dogs, a portable confessional booth that was attached to a
bicycle that he rode around one of the Democratic conventions, a miracle
drug made from roaches, a company buying unwanted dogs to use them as food,
and more. Every one of his setups is seemingly genuine, which is how the
media falls for them and reports them as real. Only after his clips come in
does he reveal that he is the wizard behind the curtain and comes clean
that it all was phony.

Skaggs is a genius at mixing just the right amount of believable and yet
unverifiable information with specific details and actual events, such as
the UN demonstration, to get reporters to drop their guard and run the
story. Once one reporter falls for his hoax, Skaggs can build on that and
get others to follow along. Skaggs’ hoaxes illustrate how little reporters
actually investigate and in most cases ignore the clues that he liberally
sprinkles around. This is why they work, and why even the same media
outlets (he has been on CNN a number of times) fall for them.

In the movie, you see Skaggs preparing one of his hoaxes. I won’t give you
more details in the hopes that you will eventually get to see the film and
don’t want to spoil it for you. He carefully gathers his actors to play
specific roles, appoints his scientific “expert” and gets the media – and
his documentary filmmaker – to follow him along. It is one of his more
brilliant set pieces.

Skaggs shows us that it pays to be skeptical, and to spend some time
proving authenticity. Given today’s online climate and how hard the public
has to work to verify basic facts, this has gotten a lot more difficult,
ironically. Most of us take things we read on faith, and especially if we
have seen it somewhere online such as Wikipedia or when we Google
something. As I wrote about the “peeps” hoax in 1998
<http://strom.com/awards/100.html>, “a website can change from moment to
moment, and pining down the truth may be a very difficult proposition. An
unauthorized employee could post a page by mistake. One man's truth is
another's falsehood, depending on your point of view. Also, how can you be
sure that someone's website is truly authentic? Maybe during the night a
group of imposters has diverted all traffic from the real site to their
own, or put up their own pages on the authentic site, unbeknown to the
site's webmaster?”

Today we have Snopes.com and fact checking efforts by the major news
organizations, but they still aren’t enough. All it takes is one gullible
person with a huge Twitter following, (I am sure you can think of a few
examples) and a hoax is born.

In the movie, trusted information is scarce and hard to find, and you see
how Skaggs builds his house of cards. It is well worth watching this master
of media manipulation at work, and a lesson for us all to be more careful,
especially when we see something online. Or read about it in the newspapers
or see something on TV.

​Comments always welcome: http://blog.strom.com/wp/?p=5654​
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.webinformant.tv/pipermail/webinformant_list.webinformant.tv/attachments/20161106/adf1e185/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the WebInformant mailing list